
Introduction
Satellite position usually described in orbital system as a function of time. Need to relate this system to a terrestrial system.
The relation between the eccentric and mean anomalies is: E = m + e sin E
Relationship be true and eccentric anomalies:

ORBITAL COORDINATE SYSTEM (OR)
The instantaneous position vector for the satellite is
where a and e are ellipsoid constants and r, f and E vary with time.

The orientation of the OR system has to be fixed in space with three more parameters. The orbital plane is extended to intersect the celestial sphere, and its trace, the projected orbit, intersects the celestial equator at the ascending node; that is, the point where the satellite crosses the celestial equator when going from the southern hemisphere to the northern hemisphere. Vice-versa, the descending node is the point where the satellite crosses the celestial equator from north to south. The angle between the orbital half-plane and the celestial equator is known the angle of inclination, i. The angle between the ascending nodal line and the line of apsides (counter-clockwise) is known as the argument of perigee, v. The angle between xAP (true vernal equinox) and the ascending nodal line measured counter-clockwise from +ZOR axis in the equatorial plane is the right ascension of the ascending node, W.
Combining these three quantities, i, v, and W with those describing the orbital ellipse and the motion of the satellite in the orbit constitute the six Keplarian orbital
elements.
SIX KEPLARIAN ORBITAL PARAMETERS
| Parameter | Name | Rational |
| a | semi-major axis | Size and shape of orbit |
| e | eccentricity | |
| v | argument of perigee |
Position of the orbit in the AP system |
| W | right ascension of the ascending node | |
| i | inclination of orbit | |
| m | mean (or other) anomaly | Position of satellite in orbit |
Point positioning requires the transformation of positions of the satellite (usually predicted in the broadcast ephemeris) from OR system to the CT system where they are used to compute the position of the observing station. This transformation proceeds in three steps: OR to AP, AP to IT, and IT to CT. The complete transformation is
The time-varying position of the satellite is known as its ephemeris. Since the ephemeris for a GPS satellite has the Earth's polar motion included in the six Keplarian parameters, the preceding equation can be simplified as
![]()
As we can see in this simpler equation, the last two rotations are both around the ZCT axis. These two rotations can be combined into one rotation of l = GAST − W further simplifying the equation to
![]()
| |
Directions for Viewing 3d Animation
|
The range mathematical model can be written as
where
is the measured range from the station Pi to satellite position Sj,
at time tj; and
= (xi, yi, zi)
are the unknown Cartesian coordinates for the receiver in the CT system. For each range observation, one range equation can be written, and four
such equations are sufficient to uniquely solve for the receiver position and the unknown timing error in the receiver. This discussion is completed in
Chapter
13 of Elementary Surveying: An Introduction in Geomatics, 11th
Ed. This
Transformations of Terrestrial PositionsIt is often necessary to transform the position of a point, typically located on the surface of the earth from one coordinate system to another. The most typical transformations are:
These transformations can be separated into two classes. The first consists of the transformation within one family of coordinate systems (such as in 1). The second class is between families of coordinate systems with different locations and orientations, and will be discussed herein.
This second transformation requires knowledge about the position and orientation of the reference ellipsoid. This task of positioning and orienting the reference ellipsoid is known as the establishment of a horizontal geodetic datum. The positioning of the reference ellipsoid requires the parameters a and f, six additional parameters for a total of eight parameters.
The six geocentric set of datum parameters are:
Thus the second transformation which goes from a geocentric system(f, l, h)G into (x, y, z)CT is done in two steps.
(1)
Obviously, if the two coordinate systems are parallel, i.e., ex = ey = ez = 0, the above equations simplifies to
The accuracy of this transformation is typically about ±2 m, but is actually dependent on the accuracy of the transformation parameters. These transformations are typically used with GPS.
The third transformation allows us to go from an astronomical system to a geodetic system is not performed today since astronomical positioning is no longer a major positioning technology. These transformations were covered in the lesson on Coordinate Systems, or can be easily accomplished by applying geodetic corrections to conventional instrument observations. This topic is included in a future lesson on Relative Positioning.
The fourth transformation is used to transform coordinates between two different
datums such as NAD27 and NAD83. In this transformation it is not only
necessary to account for differences in position and orientation of the geometric centers of the ellipsoids, but also the differing sizes of the ellipsoid. Consider
two ellipsoids with defining parameters of (a1, f1) and (a2, f2); their geometrical centers with respect to the Earth's center of mass being
and
; and their
misalignment angles with respect to the CT system being (ex1, ey1, ez1) and (ex2, ey2, ez2). Furthermore, let us denote the coordinates of a point in the first datum as
(f1, l1, h1) and in the second system as (f2, l2, h2).
There are two techniques for obtaining (f2, l2, h2) as functions of (f1, l1, h1). The first direct approach is to find the CT coordinates (x, y, z) from (f1, l1, h1) and then transform back into (f2, l2, h2) using the inverse operation. This method requires the transformations listed in 2. The second method requires knowledge of the differences da = a2 - a1; df = f2 - f1; dxE = xE2 - xE1; ... ; dez = dez2 - dez1 which must be sufficiently small.
Let the CT coordinates of a point referred to a geodetic datum be given by Eq. (1). Eq. (1) can be rewritten for small angles as
A similar set of equations can be written for the second datum, and thus
Next the Cartesian coordinates
and
are expressed in terms of curvilinear geodetic coordinates as
where (using spherical approximations of f = 0, N = M = a, and h = 0),
Performing the appropriate substitutions yields
and finally the desired transformation equation is
where
The B, T, and J matrices can be evaluated on either of the two data since the differences are assumed to be small. The T matrix is best written as